7 Dec
2009
7 Dec
'09
1:14 p.m.
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Stefan Dösinger wrote: [...]
So you mean keeping the existing infrastructure around just for midi and have something entirely different for the rest of the audio features?
That might nt be too bad in that we could still drop all the current current winmm audio backends that don't support Midi. At first glance: wineaudioio, wineesd, winejack, and winenas. So we'd just keep the Midi portion of winealsa, winecoreaudio and wineoss.
--
Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
$live{free} || die "";