Re: Implement RegFlushKey

[Shachar Shemesh]

Mike Hearn wrote:
> This implementation is a little inefficient but without using a random
> access binary db as Windows does (which I am not going to advocate) it's
> the best we can do.

Ok, I'm going to be flamed for this, but I'm going to go ahead and ask.

This is a request to understand, not a suggestion (yet?).
Why not use a general purpose DB system? (postgresql, mysql, whatever) 
After all, the registry is just a tree shaped database. We can do that 
using standard SQL, and fall back to our current method if a proper DB 
is not found.

Shachar