Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com writes:
On 01/30/2017 11:07 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
True, thx! The reason is that I'm currently ignoring handles as we don't have a clear rule for them, and as the first parameter type begins with an H, my script thought it is a handle and ignored it...
Most handles are pointer types. But of course there are exceptions.
Even when the actual type is a pointer, most handles are conceptually ints, they don't point to anything. In any case, it doesn't matter which type we use for handles, and we definitely don't want to start "fixing" them.
Maybe we should just get rid of the ptr type once and for all...