On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:43:44PM +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
I completely disagree. We can do much more than there is done right now. shdocvw is more than WebBrowser control and we can inplement those areas, but WebBrowser needs a lot of work as well. Mozilla ActiveX Control seems not to be systematically developed and the compability we need is not their aim. We need an implementation of WebBrowser based on MSHTML, which will be possible when I finish my work on it. This way we'll be able to implement shdocvw correctly (eg. it'll be possible to implement Internet Explorer OLE Automation), but now it's far, far away from it and really far from 100% complete.
This is a good discussion for WineConf. But sure, in the meantime feel free to submit a patch for this entry that better reflect your plans.
In any event, I think such a significant effort probably deserves a bit bigger space somewhere else, but it will have to wait a bit until we can figure out where exactly.