Any time you find yourself writing something along the lines of "Fix several issues ..." in a patch description, that's an indication you should probably be writing several patches instead.
On 7 December 2015 at 07:53, Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Christian Costa titan.costa@gmail.com
This makes the default values line up with native.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com
I suppose a Signed-off-by from the original author as well would too much to ask. /shrug.
- header->size = sizeof(*header);
- header->flags = DDS_CAPS | DDS_HEIGHT | DDS_WIDTH | DDS_PITCH | DDS_PIXELFORMAT | DDS_MIPMAPCOUNT;
- /* The signature is not really part of the DDS header */
- header->size = sizeof(*header) - sizeof(header->signature);
This isn't necessarily wrong, although it would be more correct to write this kind of thing as "sizeof(*header) - FIELD_OFFSET(struct dds_header, size)". As the comment already indicates though, the real issue is that the signature field shouldn't be part of the same structure.
- header->flags = DDS_CAPS | DDS_HEIGHT | DDS_WIDTH | DDS_PIXELFORMAT; header->height = src_desc.Height; header->width = src_desc.Width; header->pitch_or_linear_size = dst_pitch;
You remove DDS_PITCH from the flags, but set the field here anyway. The test doesn't test it. Somewhat similarly, the test doesn't verify the value of the "caps" field.