On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:31:36AM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote: [...]
The LPSTORAGE layout is definitely not the same.
What do you mean? I just replaced 'IStoreage *' with 'LPSTORAGE' and since the LPSTORAGE declaration is 'typedef IStorage *LPSTORAGE;' the layout should be the same. Now if the original prototype was wrong for some other reason that's another issue.
For the 32bit functions use of "LPSTORAGE" is fine.
For the 16bit functions I do not know. The interface itself is the same, but the calling conventions really are not.
So this is more of a programming detail.
So LPSTORAGE16 would be more fitting I think.
You mean in the documentation?
In the documentation I guess it is ok.
Also when not using "SEGPTR" I get conversion warnings and it clarifies a bit what exactly the type of the argument is.
Do you mean it would be better not to use 'SEGPTR' in the prototypes?
No, I meant that I did switch to SEGPTR because of it.
Anyway, its fine as is. :)
Ciao, Marcus