15 Jan
2003
15 Jan
'03
3:45 p.m.
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:52:59 +0100 (CET) Sylvain Petreolle spetreolle@yahoo.fr wrote:
--- Tony Lambregts tony_lambregts@telusplanet.net a écrit :
Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
Why not only change _small_ FAT to FAT32 ?
Well floppies are obviously not FAT32. No big deal but why stop at FAT32. Why not NTFS?
Im not against NTFS. It was just the lazy approach.
Perhaps we should be looking at it in another way ? for example does anyone know of applications that use the fs type as a sort of 'work on 9X but not NT' type of test. Given the variation of silly checks for the registry this is a possibility and might be a major factor.