Re: user32/tests: Add tests for STM_SETIMAGE and STM_SETICON messageprocessing

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Ilya Shpigor"  wrote:
> - SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_BITMAP, (LPARAM)hbm);
> - res = SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_BITMAP, (LPARAM)hbm);
> - ok(!res, "expected NULL got 0x%lx\n", res);
> -
> - SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ICON, (LPARAM)hicon);
> - res = SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ICON, (LPARAM)hicon);
> - ok(!res, "expected NULL got 0x%lx\n", res);
> -
> - SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETICON, (WPARAM)hicon, 0);
> - res = SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETICON, (WPARAM)hicon, 0);
> - ok(!res, "expected NULL got 0x%lx\n", res);
> -
> - SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ENHMETAFILE, (LPARAM)hemf);
> - res = SendMessageW(hStatic, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ENHMETAFILE, (LPARAM)hemf);
> - ok(!res, "expected NULL got 0x%lx\n", res);

Is there a reason you are calling SendMessageW twice (here and in the following tests)?