Re: Wine 0.9 progress

[Jakob Eriksson]

Mike Hearn wrote:
> Is there anything else we might need? I'm tempted to say that having
> InstallShield work is a priority, as it seems to have broken quite a bit
> lately.

Well, if development after 0.9 is going to focus on correctness while
getting to 1.0,
lots of conformance testing is a must.  I really was looking forward to
write a
testing application that runs all the tests, but I can't figure out why
make crosstest is not
working.
(It's something to do about linking with ntdll.)

If crosstest was working, the meta-test program could be built as part
of daily wine builds.
Windows testers (myself included) could download the daily crosstest and
automatically
upload results into some stats page on winehq.

regards,
Jakob