Am Montag, den 31.10.2005, 19:05 -0500 schrieb Vincent Béron:
Le lun 31/10/2005 à 18:10, Jesse Allen a écrit : [snip]
Sorry, but things are a bit weird with the supplied wine-0.9 for FC3. In order to counter-proof, I did a rpmbuild -bb ... with the *unpatched* sources from wine-0.9-1fc3-winehq and also ended up with dead sound, until I set winecfg to "OSS"! Then sound worked with patched or unpatched mixer.c source.
Which alsa-libs rpms do you have? Any other sound related things not added via rpm?
The patches in the FC3 srpm don't touch anything even remotely related to sound output, so it's probably a build machine difference we're seeing.
Strangely, when I installed the provided binary FC3.rpm, winecfg works only with "ALSA" sound setting. Obviously there is something wrong with the build specs of this package, I have to check later.
See above. A rpm -qa | LC_ALL=POSIX sort>rpm-list.txt might be helpful.
Vincent
Dear Vincent,
I have been rpmbuilding the sources on my FC3 system with the latest standard kernel-2.6.12-1.1381_FC3, which like all previous Fedora 2.6.x kernels has no support for OSS.
My rpm system is: rpm-4.3.2-21 rpm-python-4.3.2-21 rpm-libs-4.3.2-21 rpm-devel-4.3.2-21 rpm-build-4.3.2-21
My installed alsa rpms are: alsaplayer-0.99.76-3 alsa-utils-1.0.6-3 alsa-lib-1.0.6-8.FC3
I run a few 'non-rpmed' binary packages like Java, LimeWire, a homebanking solution and some games, but nothing that IMHO could in such a way interfere with the sound system.
Correction to my prev posting: When the binary wine-0.9 package is installed, I can choose "ALSA" or "OSS" in winecfg as sound setting and have sound. With the compiled version only "OSS" gives me sound.
For either version: When choosing "Automatic" to auto-detect the sound system, both come up with "OSS" though it is definitvely not installed. Hitting "Configure" does not work too. I get the message that it "could not open wineoss.drv or winealsa.drv", though that may not be implemented yet.