On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 10/31/21 7:24 PM, David Kahurani wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 7:17 PM Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 10/31/21 7:14 PM, David Kahurani wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 7:11 PM Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 10/31/21 6:34 PM, David Kahurani wrote:
Signed-off-by: David Kahurani k.kahurani@gmail.com
include/commctrl.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/commctrl.h b/include/commctrl.h index 41abceb..d67f5f7 100644 --- a/include/commctrl.h +++ b/include/commctrl.h @@ -3939,8 +3939,8 @@ typedef struct tagLVITEMINDEX (INT)SNDMSGW((hwnd),LVM_SETITEMW,0,(LPARAM)(const LVITEMW
*)(pitem))
#define ListView_SetItem WINELIB_NAME_AW(ListView_SetItem) #define ListView_SetItemState(hwnd,i,data,dataMask) \ -{ LVITEM _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\
- SNDMSG(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM)
(LPLVITEM)&_LVi);}
+{ LVITEMW _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\
- SNDMSGW(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM)
(LPLVITEMW)&_LVi);}
#define ListView_GetItemState(hwnd,i,mask) \
(UINT)SNDMSG((hwnd),LVM_GETITEMSTATE,(WPARAM)(UINT)(i),(LPARAM)(UINT)(mask))
#define ListView_SetCheckState(hwndLV, i, bCheck) \
This doesn't match what SDK does.
Are you saying there is some other magic beyond what is already in this
macro or a difference in width(s) used?
SNDMSG resolves to either SendMessageA or SendMessageW, I don't see anything special for _SetItemState() in SDK.
SNDMSG will resolve to an error if you try to use this macro. LVMITEM should also be either LVMITEMA or LVMITEMW. It looked to me like this code preceeds these conventions.
It's not clear what motivated this change, could you clarify?
I was trying to use ListView_SetItemState in some other code.
Brilliant, thanks for clearing that up.
If you tried to use it in Wine, yes, it won't work, because you can't use
SendMessage macro when in __WINESRC__. Instead of ListView_* macros you'll need to make explicit SendMessage calls.