Re: crypt32: CryptProtectData/CryptUnprotectData take 2

[Kees Cook]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:32:11PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
> The new patch looks good.  I should have mentioned before that writing a 
> test case will help your patch be accepted.  Did you have any test code 
> about that you could turn into a test case for your newly implemented 
> functions?

Sure, I can write something.  I'll look around for docs on how to run 
tests -- I didn't find that when I looked around this morning.

Also: I realize I should provide full documentation for the actual 
Windows API calls themselves.  I documented everything BUT those.  :)  
What's the convention for the number after the API name?  I've seen some 
with numbers, and some with just an "@" sign?