On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Jeremy Newman wrote:
The xml file would look like this:
<screenshot> <description> hey, you can write stuff here.. </description> </screenshot>
Well, having this XML only for description is a bit useless, isn't it? But if you like it so much, why not use the XML features, and give up on the restrictive naming:
<screenshot> <thumb>wine_someimage.png</thumb> <large>full/wine_someimage.png</thumb> <description> hey, you can write stuff here.. </description> </screenshot>
or we can do (if you want to keep the fixed locations):
<screenshot> <name>wine_someimage.png</name> <description> hey, you can write stuff here.. </description> </screenshot>
or maybe:
<screenshot name="wine_someimage.png"> <description> hey, you can write stuff here.. </description> </screenshot>
And if so, why stick them into shots/desc? Put them into shots/ directly, they drive the entire thing. And we should move the thumbnails into a thumb/ dir for consistency...