Joshua Beck jxb091000@utdallas.edu wrote:
Or even better:
- for(i = 0; i< 144; i+=4)
- {
vertices[i ] *= width;
vertices[++i] *= height;
vertices[++i] *= depth;
- }
There shouild be i + 1 and i + 2 instead of two ++i otherwise the loop index gets corrupted.
You mean like this?
- for(i = 0; i< 144; i+=6)
- {
vertices[i ] *= width;
vertices[i + 1] *= height;
vertices[i + 2] *= depth;
- }
Looks like I misread the original loop condition. Both your variants are fine.