re: Right way to cope with user error in make test?

[Dan Kegel]

jwhite wrote:
> The attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case.
> Does this seem like a reasonable approach to folks?

I like it.

I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about
letting people build wine without a full complement
of development headers.  Maybe our configure
should have a sanity check at the end, and abort
if something optional but very common is missing;
we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable
configuring in that case if it's really intended.
- Dan