Re: [1/18] d3dx9: Add shader assembler private definitions

[Henri Verbeet]

2009/8/18 Matteo Bruni :
> constructs, single instructions, ...) but it seems to be quite a work
> and in any case the resulting patch needs to have a working lexer,
> parser, bytecode writer and the glue among them, so it can't be made
> smaller than so much, I believe.

I don't think that's really a requirement. It's probably fine to e.g.
just add a minimal lexer first, then add a minimal parser, etc.