Huw Davies wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:22:29AM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
Huw Davies wrote:
dlls/user32/tests/clipboard.c | 7 +++++-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Was just about to sent a patch along those lines.
Isn't it better to mark that win9x (and winME as well btw) one as broken()?
I was debating with myself whether to mark it as broken or not. My feeling was that it's not actually broken behaviour rather missing functionality. But I don't really care.
Huw.
Maybe it's not broken() behavior but marking it as broken() makes sure we (Wine) will have CF_UNICODETEXT. Without that broken(), CF_UNICODETEXT can go missing without us knowing.