6 Oct
2006
6 Oct
'06
9:03 a.m.
On 10/6/06, Kai Blin kai.blin@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote:
Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps will go mucking about with data other apps care about, in which case a per-executable simulated device would be best.
Wouldn't that break on Windows, too? If I have have two apps that muck about in my mbr, I expect them both to work, so they better do whatever they do in a sane way. I don't see how this would be different for a simulated drive.
Yeah. you're right. I just don't trust every app that mucks about with the MBR to be courteous and correct ;)
--tim