Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 13:23 -0700, Dan Kegel a écrit :
On 10/3/05, James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com wrote:
This method is already available in the form of checking out lostwages cvs, making changes, doing a diff, and sending in the patch to be accepted. The only difference is that anyone can make changes to lostwages this way (assuming they get committed).
There is a certain lack of feedback in the process, though. I did exactly what you suggested: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2005-September/021063.html but haven't heard back, nor has the change been committed.
I think it would be preferable to put these infos in the Wiki or in lostwages and avoid having resources at too much different places, it will just confuse users imho. I know you don't like Wikis, but it's just a matter of copy pasting your content. I can do it if you want.