* On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
The win9x support makes the tests less strict, by allowing additional behaviors, and that only when running on Windows.
Is that a problem?
Running them on Wine is pointless since these code paths are never executed.
I may be missing the point, but Wine uses broken() function already. Similar function, eg. dead_9x(), could be easily created to check for such cases.
And does this mean that Windows 3.1 (and DOS?) tests aren't welcome now?
As part of the winetest infrastructure, they are not welcome, and never have been.
I have at least one Win16 app which behaves differently on Win16, on XP and on Wine [*]. What's the right way to get it running OK on Wine then (without appropriate Win16API tests) ?
S.