On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:17:43PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de writes:
i'm not 100% sure what -DWINE_NO_STRICT should do, but i suspect it should negate the effect of -DSTRICT. The attached patch enables that and lets wine compile with -DSTRICT where WINE_NO_STRICT isn't defined.
WINE_NO_STRICT not only undoes the effect of -DSTRICT, but it also makes handles UINTs, which -DSTRICT is not supposed to do. And the idea was that -D__WINE__ would implicitly force -DSTRICT so that you
Ok, that makes sense.
don't have to specify it. But I agree the #ifdefs could be improved so that it still works even if you add -DSTRICT. Something like the patch below should work I think.
Yes, it works, could you please commit it?
thanks bye michael