Andreas Mohr andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de writes:
Also, why did it take so long to tackle that? (I had this error several weeks ago already) There have been multiple reports by different people that 2.6.x is broken, yet not too much of a reaction. Oh, and to top it: it's still broken ;-)
You are right, this is a scandal. You should ask for a refund.
Any actually working fix available, or should I try to work on a fix?
If you want a fix, then working on it is certainly more useful than complaining. You could start by sending me an strace log of the problem, as well as your dlls/ntdll/virtual.o file.