Re: actxprxy/qmgrprxy: Specify dlldata.c in C_SRCS instead of in EXTRA_OBJS to allow dependencies to be generated.

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Rob Shearman"  writes:
> Yes, I have verified that by looking at the dependencies in the
> makefile for these DLLs. I did check this before sending the patch,
> but I'm not sure why I didn't see this before.
>
> However, I'm not that happy with depending on a magic name here - is
> there a way we can put this name into a makefile variable?

Not easily, you'd have to add yet another option to makedep, I'm not
sure I see the point. What's wrong with dlldata.c?