Re: winex11: Remove dead assignment (clang)

[Aric Stewart]

Are you sure that is dead? clang must be saying so but the assignment of ximStyleCallback to ximStyle seems meaningful. Just above this code we have code that ensures that ximStyle is not 0, so if ximStyleCallback == 0 then assigning ximStyleCallback = ximStyle does not seem dead to me.

-aric
> From: André Hentschel 
> Subject: winex11: Remove dead assignment (clang)
> Message-Id: 
> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:11:02 +0100
> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel
>
> dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c
> index e51169d..3978bca 100644
> --- a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c
> +++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c
> @@ -416,10 +416,7 @@ static BOOL open_xim( Display *display )
>              ximStyle = ximStyleNone;
>      if (ximStyleCallback == 0)
> -
>    {
>        TRACE("No callback style available\n");
> -
>        ximStyleCallback = ximStyle;
> -
>    }
>
> }
>
> -- 
> 2.7.4