On Friday 18 July 2008 16:11:37 Dan Kegel wrote:
Building winhttp on top of wininet lets us develop on trunk and is probably the fastest path to making a bunch of applications happy, isn't it? That's the way I'm leaning, anyway.
True, but that's been tried already:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wine-devel@winehq.org/msg37935.html
Implementing wininet on top of winhttp looks better architecture-wise. It would solve the problem with retrieving certificates that Zac pointed out and it's cleaner to implement wininet style callbacks on top of winhttp than the other way around.
-Hans