Your wined3d_gl.h patch was applied, the others weren't
Sometimes too much discussion makes AJ wait on a patch too, to see how the discussion turns out. If you resend your patches I'll just reply with an "patch is ok" mail to avoid further confusion
-----Original Message----- From: Nick Burns [mailto:adger44@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2008 1:06 AM To: stefan@codeweavers.com; wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix glReadPixels call from read_from_framebuffer (re-redux)
Thanks for the explanation -- I will email asking why soon -- and perhaps resubmit the other patch I have been looking at http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs to see what has been applied
But source.winehq.org/git shows the diffs much nicer
- Nick
From: stefan@codeweavers.com To: adger44@hotmail.com; wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix glReadPixels call from read_from_framebuffer
(re-redux)
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:48:24 +0100
Thanks for reviewing my patch (it sure makes the SHOGO menu much
nicer)
BTW do you know if I need to resubmit my other SHOGO patch ([PATCH]
Fix
ddraw surface version setting)?
Yes, I recommend to do that. It is likely that it was lost or didn't
apply
any longer after the 3 days it waited in moderation.
You can see on source.winehq.org/git or with 'git log origin' if your
patch
was applied. If it wasn't, it is best to send a mail to wine-devel
asking
why, or ask Alexandre(nick 'julliard') on #winehackers. Quite often Alexandre sends a reply if he doesn't like the patch(or someone else
does),
but not always.
Alexandre usually wants a confirmation from someone who knows the
area(in
the case of d3d Heri, Roderick or me) if a new contributor sends a
patch,
hence my "the patch is ok" mails.
I don't know if Alexandre will apply patches over the holidays, so if
the
patch is silently ignored it is best to resend it in a few days.