Re: [PATCH 2/2] opencl: Basic OpenCL 1.0 implementation. (try 2)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Peter Urbanec  writes:
> Couple of reasons. First, a machine may or may not have an OpenCL
> implementation installed and it may or may not have the required
> hardware.

That's not necessary, the dll will fail to load either way.
> Second, I am anticipating that when wine OpenCL 1.1 support
> is added, we'll need to determine whether the host is using OpenCL 1.0
> or 1.1, at runtime.

How is that going to work?