Paul Millar paulm@astro.gla.ac.uk writes:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Paul Millar paulm@astro.gla.ac.uk writes:
For some reason, running make inside dlls directory generated more *_test.exe's than a simple "make -k".
I guess this may be caused by the lib*.a import libs in dlls: using those of Wine is not the same as using the MinGW versions.
So, should I just do a "make -k" from the base directory and leave broken tests to fail? (I haven't tried with the current code, so this may be redundant now.)
I don't know, really. I'm not sure what these import libraries really are, just guessing. Can anybody help out?
I've also removed the urlmon test [...] just to allow winetest.exe to build. Do you know if that's been fixed?
Probably not.
So, should we remove (from Makefile.in) tests that currently block winetest.exe from building? To me, building /something/ is better than nothing. Extra tests can be added once they're building correctly.
Yes, it's probably better than making the make process more forgiving. Requires maintenance, though.