On 2/22/19 9:22 PM, Fabian Maurer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de
dlls/user32/combo.c | 4 ++++ dlls/user32/tests/combo.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/user32/combo.c b/dlls/user32/combo.c index 59c2e6484c..10fbed6a7f 100644 --- a/dlls/user32/combo.c +++ b/dlls/user32/combo.c @@ -1025,6 +1025,10 @@ static void CBDropDown( LPHEADCOMBO lphc )
nIHeight = (int)SendMessageW(lphc->hWndLBox, LB_GETITEMHEIGHT, 0, 0);
nDroppedHeight--;if (nDroppedHeight < nIHeight + COMBO_YBORDERSIZE())nDroppedHeight = COMBO_YBORDERSIZE();nHeight = nIHeight*nItems; if (nHeight < nDroppedHeight - COMBO_YBORDERSIZE())
This doesn't look good. What does decrement by 1 mean in this context, and why it's exactly 1?
Right after this block there is another fixup condition for nDroppedHeight, could it be merged?
Does the same apply to comctl32 copy?
diff --git a/dlls/user32/tests/combo.c b/dlls/user32/tests/combo.c index 12e4ed5862..ed945180bc 100644 --- a/dlls/user32/tests/combo.c +++ b/dlls/user32/tests/combo.c @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static void test_listbox_size(DWORD style) BOOL todo; } info_height[] = { {2, 24, FALSE},
{2, 41, TRUE},
{2, 41, FALSE}, {2, 42, FALSE}, {2, 50, FALSE}, {2, 60, FALSE},@@ -697,17 +697,17 @@ static void test_listbox_size(DWORD style) {2, 89, FALSE}, {2, 90, FALSE}, {2, 100, FALSE},
{3, 73, TRUE},
{3, 73, FALSE}, {10, 24, FALSE},
{10, 40, TRUE},{10, 41, TRUE},
{10, 40, FALSE},{10, 41, FALSE}, {10, 42, FALSE}, {10, 50, FALSE}, {10, 60, FALSE}, {10, 80, FALSE}, {10, 88, FALSE},
{10, 89, TRUE},
{10, 89, FALSE}, {10, 90, FALSE}, {10, 100, FALSE}, };-- 2.20.1