On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Michael Müller michael@fds-team.de wrote:
Am 03.04.2017 um 20:25 schrieb Austin English:
Mentioned in https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42744 and https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42746.
Does it really make sense to add such a stub? Windows is supposed to show a BSOD when you call the function and I guess it is not supposed to return back to the caller. I would either leave it as a stub or at least unload the driver / terminate the process with an error.
I see few reports of it, so it's hard to know what the app really needs. Anyway, I think it's better to handle it in some way than to crash on an unimplemented function, even if it's a stub.
I don't think Wine needs to implement a BSOD. At least not until 2018/04/01 ;)