On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:45:00PM -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 06:11:33PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
I couldn't find the patch at either of the two links Jesse posted, but I did see something similar here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&m=110048429304053&w=...
That's a brand new patch today.
"x86: only single-step into signal handlers if the tracer asked for it."
Looks like Linus may have been alerted by the problem and made this patch just in time for 2.6.10-rc2. Is this the "switch-off" we need?
I'll be testing it shortly.
It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem. So I'm wondering a few things. Does wine need to be patched? This new patch seems to be related to a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting. I've tried 2.6.10-rc2 with patch #1 reversed and patch 1+3 reversed. No difference this time.
Any idea will help.
Jesse