Re: [PATCH 3/3] configure: Use 0 instead of NULL because NULL isn't defined.

[Stefan Dösinger]

Am Samstag, 20. Oktober 2007 00:36:13 schrieb Ken Thomases:
> On Oct 19, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 23:18:51 schrieb Ken Thomases:
> > > This makes the test test the proper thing on Mac OS X.  It still
> > > fails, but
> > > for a good reason.
> > >
> > > configure.ac |    6 +++---
> > >   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > - char *name=NULL;
> > > - char *name=0;
> >
> > Shouldn't that be (void *) 0 or (char *) 0?
>
> I don't think that's necessary.  It compiled without warning here,
> even with -Wall.  Doesn't the C standard says that 0 casts to a
> pointer naturally?  Maybe that's C++.

I think with -pedantic it warns about that. It could be gcc version dependent 
too.