"Dimitrie O. Paun" dpaun@rogers.com writes:
Looks good, but why did you change it from a cui to a gui? I guess it's fine, we will want to go down that path eventually...
Er, I did not. I think it has been a gui ever since its birth...
- How to integrate cross compilation into the Makefile?
That's an interesting question. I suggest we create two .rc files: winetests-elf.rc and winetests-pe.rc, and we link it with the other stuff in two executables: winetests and winetests.exe respectively. Any other ideas?
Sounds good enough. The question was about the Makefile, though. I don't know the build system, unfortunately, so I don't even know if it has the necessary basis for this.
Well, I was hoping that we can have one executable that just links in with different .rc. In other words, when we compile main.c (to get main.o) we don't know if we're going to run a PE or ELF tests.
Ok, that will be done.
- How to derive/give the cleaning rules?
What cleaning rules?
In the Makefile, again. That's why I added the PROGRAMS = winetests.c winetests.rc ... hack to the Makefile.
- Did Jon Bright contribute his SMTP client in the end? We could as well use it... Or would it be better (more reliable) to POST it through HTTP?
Yes, he did send it to me some time ago. What happens now with the output? We don't seem to be sending it anywhere... I'll forward it to you in a few moments.
Thanks, got it. Not sure... Presently, the output simply stays in the log file (it's not deleted). It got rid of the shell dependencies for now.
Feri.