Re: [PATCH 03/10] widl: Implement a more abstract way of representing basic types.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Rob Shearman  writes:
> Thanks for the info. Does the attached patch fix it?

Not quite (static variables are zero anyway), but this does:

diff --git a/tools/widl/typetree.c b/tools/widl/typetree.c
index 57a5736..74cbd5f 100644
--- a/tools/widl/typetree.c
+++ b/tools/widl/typetree.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ type_t *type_new_basic(enum type_basic_type basic_type)

type_t *type_new_int(enum type_basic_type basic_type, int sign)
 {
-    static type_t *int_types[TYPE_BASIC_INT_MAX][3];
+    static type_t *int_types[TYPE_BASIC_INT_MAX+1][3];

assert(basic_type <= TYPE_BASIC_INT_MAX);