On Tue, 19 May 2020, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=71986
Your paranoid android.
=== debiant (32 bit report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
I can't reproduce this; the test relies on the ucrtbase printf patch that was pushed just before posting this patch.
// Martin