Alex Henrie alexhenrie24@gmail.com writes:
2012/12/5 Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org:
You have nowhere near enough tests to make such a claim. When I said to write more tests, I didn't mean one or two more. You'd probably need at least 100 tests to have decent coverage of all the interesting cases.
It's not as much of a technical problem as it is a communication problem--I don't know what "interesting cases" you have in mind that are not already covered by the tests. Perhaps these cases would be obvious to a more experienced developer, but they are not to me.
If you can't think of anything to test beyond the handful of cases you already have, then you shouldn't be implementing that function. There's no hope that your code will be able to cope with invalid input if you can't even imagine what invalid input could look like.