Dylan Smith wrote:
The border widths documented by msdn are in points which are 72 dpi, which is not equivalent to pixels (normally 96 dpi). I pre-converted all the border widths to 96 dpi resolution since this avoids needed to store fractions, and often avoids the need for convertion to the displays resolution.
dlls/riched20/editor.h | 2 +- dlls/riched20/paint.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- dlls/riched20/wrap.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Dylan:
git apply complains about whitespace errors:
0001-richedit-Documented-paragraph-border-widths-are-in-p.patch:10: trailing whitespace. int ME_GetParaBorderWidth(ME_Context *c, int flags); 0001-richedit-Documented-paragraph-border-widths-are-in-p.patch:35: trailing whitespace. /* The documented widths are in points (72 dpi), but converting them to 0001-richedit-Documented-paragraph-border-widths-are-in-p.patch:36: trailing whitespace. * 96 dpi (standard display resolution) avoids dealing with fractions. */ 0001-richedit-Documented-paragraph-border-widths-are-in-p.patch:37: trailing whitespace. static const struct {unsigned width : 8, pen_style : 4, dble : 1;} border_details[] = { 0001-richedit-Documented-paragraph-border-widths-are-in-p.patch:38: trailing whitespace. /* none */ {0, PS_SOLID, FALSE}, error: patch failed: dlls/riched20/editor.h:229 error: dlls/riched20/editor.h: patch does not apply error: patch failed: dlls/riched20/paint.c:461 error: dlls/riched20/paint.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: dlls/riched20/wrap.c:522 error: dlls/riched20/wrap.c: patch does not apply
Current git as of this morning.
James McKenzie