Re: Wine without X? Failing in dlls/winex11.drv

[Alexandre Julliard]

Gerald Pfeifer  writes:
> How to fix this?
>
> Should dlls/winex11.drv just not be built in such a case?  Should 
> configure error out?  (We do have --without-x, too, though.)  Anything 
> else?
>
> Currently we do pass configure and then run into a compile failure
> later on.

It's definitely supposed to fail in configure. That's handled by the
standard autoconf built-in check for X. Please try to figure out why it
doesn't catch that case.