Re: [PATCH] Version info for comctl32.dll

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

 wrote:
> > Could you please experiment some more and try to replace 2,20,4054,1 and
> > "2.20.4054" to the something more simple: 2,0,0,0 and "2.0". If with that
> > numbers juno will not work 2,1,0,0 and "2.1", then 2,2,0,0 and "2.2" and
> > so forth?
>
> Okay.  2.20.4054 is the minimum, it seems, but I'll try 2.21 and so on
> shortly.

Perhaps we should use some bogus version value (say 10.0) for all wine built-in dlls?
I just don't like an idea to hunt down all that cases when some application will want
that strange version numbers. Will 10.0 work for you?