Re: Bidi B patch

[Robert North]

Alexandre Julliard julliard-at-winehq.org |Wine Mailing Lists| wrote:
> Jeff Smith  writes:
> > I'm sorry, so maybe it is not necessary, but how does
> > doing it the 'right way' add confusion?
>
> There is no 'right way', inside the source tree both are completely
> equivalent. Changing it adds confusion because you now have 1000 files
> doing it one way and 3 files doing it differently for no good reason.

This thread has been confusing me.
I was under the impression that when appropriate
people should be changing "" includes to <>.

I was wondering why I had this impression, and then remembered
this section on the wine janatorial page:

`Include statements should use <> instead of ""`

Is this now incorrect?
Confused
    -Rob.