Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com writes:
I therefor propose to standardize all the internal HeapAlloc wrappers to a common name and form, Something along the lines of: walloc() wzalloc() wrealloc() wzrealloc() wfree() It's short and concise and doesn't conflict with the Win32 API.
Standardizing them is OK, but the names aren't very good, especially walloc looks too much like malloc. It's suggest something like heap_alloc, heap_alloc_zero, etc.
Yeah, i went for the convention used by the Linux kernel replacing 'k' with 'w'. But I don't mind how they are named as long as it is consistent.
I'll do a janitorial task page for this and start sending patches.
bye michael