Re: Developer's path to Windows/*NIX multi-platform?

[Mike Hearn]

On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 08:31:38 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Since you've mentioned the toolkits, a small comment on that.
> Of the two only QT is a serious option for cross-platform development.
> It's a good option, but it's not perfect because your application 
> will not be native in GNOME, you will not be using the native toolkits
> in Windows, you have to pay a lot of licensing fees, etc. Maybe
> wxWindows is a better option...

What's wrong with GTK+/Win32? Last time I checked it used the native XP
theming engine and looked right in Win2K/98 as well. There are a lot of
open source apps with thriving win32 ports using it, and it's been
integrated with the main tree.