Re: USER32: Patch 1 of 6: Fix returned value of LB_DIR

[James Hawkins]

On 11/10/07, James Hawkins  wrote:
> On 11/10/07, Alex Villacís Lasso  wrote:
> > Tests reveal that (on an unsorted listbox), LB_DIR returns the value of the
> > highest index inserted, as if it had sorted the list of files before starting
> > the insertion. This patch attempts to replicate this behavior.
> >
> > Changelog:
> > - Make LB_DIR return an index value as if it had inserted filenames in sorted
> > order.
>
> Tests?  Tests that aren't in the test suite that should be to verify
> the patch is correct?

I'll go ahead and eat this one :)