Re: [QUARTZ] Revert regsvr.c patch

[Robert Shearman]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian made me aware of the following:
>
> As long as this object is not implemented, the FIXME should remain to
> remind us that something is missing from quartz.
>
> As 'Seeking' is not yet implemented I would like to have this patch
> reverted.
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul
>
> Changelog
>  Remove CLSID for registration as it's not implemented yet.

There is no need to revert the patch because, although the CLSID is not 
implement yet, it will still print out a fixme in DllGetClassObject 
(line 181 in dlls/quartz/main.c).

Rob