On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de wrote:
patches/expire | 1 + patches/patches.css | 1 + patches/update | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/patches/expire b/patches/expire index f143ab1..3cf75e6 100755 --- a/patches/expire +++ b/patches/expire @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ my %status_expiry = "split" => 7, "depend" => 7, "sequence" => 7,
- "staging" => 30, "superseded" => 1, "testcase" => 7, "testfail" => 7,
diff --git a/patches/patches.css b/patches/patches.css index 745ec75..5746057 100644 --- a/patches/patches.css +++ b/patches/patches.css @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ tr.odd { background-color: #f8e8e8; } .sequence, .sequence :link, .sequence :visited { color: #e08000; } .deferred, .deferred :link, .deferred :visited { color: #e08000; } .testcase, .testcase :link, .testcase :visited { color: #e08000; } +.staging, .staging :link, .staging :visited { color: #e08000; } .other, .other :link, .other :visited { color: #e08000; } .applyfail, .applyfail :link, .applyfail :visited { color: red; } .buildfail, .buildfail :link, .buildfail :visited { color: red; } diff --git a/patches/update b/patches/update index 4ccc910..335af0b 100755 --- a/patches/update +++ b/patches/update @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ my %status_descr = "depend" => "Dependency", "superseded" => "Superseded", "sequence" => "Bad sequence",
- "staging" => "Staging", "testcase" => "Needs tests", "testfail" => "Test failure",
); @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ my @legend = "<li>Someone else fixed the problem already.</li></ul>" ], [ "testcase", "<ul><li>You need to write some test cases demonstrating that the patch is correct.</li></ul>" ], [ "deferred", "<ul><li>The patch is deferred because of code freeze for an upcoming release. Either resend after the release, make the patch less intrusive, or make a convincing argument that it needs to be included in the release.</li></ul>" ],
- [ "staging", "<ul><li>The patch needs more work or wider testing. Please get it in over Wine Staging.</li></ul>" ], [ "other", "<ul><li>The patch belongs to another WineHQ project (website, appdb, etc.) and will be applied by the respective maintainer.</li></ul>" ], [ "applyfail", "<ul><li>The patch got mangled in transit.</li>" . "<li>It's not relative to the latest git.</li>" .
-- 2.4.2
I'm not sure we want to encourage wine-stating from Upstream (I'm not convinced either way), but in any case, the grammar seems wrong to me as a native speaker, how about: "The patch needs more work or wider testing. Please try to get into Wine-Staging."
or something similar?