Re: [PATCH 2/6] winmm: DriverCallback ignores a 0 CALLBACK_WINDOW.

[Alexandre Julliard]

 writes:
> - I thought about merging patches 2+3+5 into one or two. After all,
>
> they all change the one tiny DriverCallback function.
>  E.g. patch 2 fixes the corner case where Wine delivers a spurious
>  message to the thread message queue, while patch 5 generalizes
>  the behaviour that MS mentions (and I tested), i.e. ignore any 0 dwCallback.
>  OTOH, split is split.

They have to be merged somehow, it doesn't make sense to add code that
gets removed again in the next patch.