Hmm,
How about a more general approach, then. I offered in the past to put wine's registry into a relational database, for performance reasons. That was turned down due to editability reasons.
However, how about we use a plugin mechanism. We will have the wine built in text-file registry handler, and we will also have a plugin mechanism by which we could write external registry handlers. This way, wine could have registry in a relational database, in a binary windows compatible file, or using these guys' project, and the end user will be the one to decide which is best for them.
David Lee Lambert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 03:27:49PM +0200, Robert van Herk wrote:
Lots of good reasons on why this project is not good enough to rely on.
Shachar