2017-01-06 4:57 GMT-07:00 Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com:
On 6 January 2017 at 08:07, Alex Henrie alexhenrie24@gmail.com wrote:
This isn't a regression, right?
@@ -2975,10 +2975,7 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI ddraw1_CreateSurface(IDirectDraw *iface, hr = ddraw_surface_create(ddraw, &surface_desc2, &impl, outer_unknown, 1); wined3d_mutex_unlock(); if (FAILED(hr))
- {
*surface = NULL; return hr;
- }
This does a bit more than the commit message says it does, this doesn't write to *surface on any error from ddraw_surface_create(). That may very well be correct, but that's not what the test tests. The test only tests that CreateSurface() doesn't crash on error with an invalid "surface" pointer, but that could also be because of e.g. an exception handler. If you want to prove that it doesn't (try to) write to the "surface" pointer, you should pass a valid pointer to CreateSurface() and test that it isn't modified after the call.
Thanks for the feedback. No, this isn't a regression. Should I wait until after the code freeze to submit a revised patchset?
-Alex