Re: user32: Add more ShowWindow tests

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dmitry Timoshkov"  writes:
> It would be better, yes, but I don't see how adding new tests could avoid
> that if the existing test fail already. I don't see how I can make existing
> tests not fail while adding new ones and not touching any real code. I can
> resend the patch with omitting the lines in my patch which mark existing
> (failing) tests as todo, is that what you need? Certaily I can have a look
> why existing tests fail (do they fail for you?), but that has nothing to do
> with this my patch.

No, the existing tests don't fail for me, otherwise they wouldn't be
in the tree.