On 2019-12-07 09:52-0000 Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 7/12/19 7:48 pm, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2019-12-05 14:03+0100 Olivier F. R. Dierick wrote:
Version rebased upstreamed added updated predicted predicted-rebased T U A u P D
4.17 855 5 9 7 n/a n/a 4.18 850 1 1 3 855 5 4.19 840 8 1 1 843 3 4.20 832 8 1 3 833 1 4.21 833 0 6 2 838 5
These rebased number is the total number of patches applied to the current wine. The numbers aren't always going to add up as you expect, For example: we might disable a patchset from one version to another while we workout a regression or drop a patch(s) because they aren't correct or add patches to a patchset to increase functionally.
This release will have two patches listed as upstreamed but were actually part of the previous release since I initial disabled the patchset until I could verify that these patches were no longer required. Likewise we might drop/disable the remaining wusa patch since we are unable to verify whether is actually required anymore, which wont be listed in the release notes.
Hi Alistair:
Thanks for answering my curiosity about these numbers in your reports.
Best wishes to you and the rest of the staging team with continuing your useful work.
Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin
Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________
Linux-powered Science __________________________